A 68-year-old retired teacher—we'll call her Margaret—came to my office last month with a DEXA scan that frankly worried me. Her T-score was -2.7 at the lumbar spine, putting her squarely in osteoporosis territory. She'd been taking calcium citrate for three years, religiously, 1,200 mg daily with vitamin D. "I'm doing everything right," she said, her voice tight with frustration. "Why are my bones still getting worse?"
Here's the thing—Margaret's story isn't unusual. In my 20 years of practice, I've seen countless patients dutifully taking calcium supplements that... well, just don't seem to move the needle on bone density. And it's not their fault. The calcium supplement aisle is confusing, with different forms making different promises. Today, I want to cut through that noise and look at what the actual research says about two of the most common forms: calcium hydroxyapatite versus calcium citrate.
Quick Facts: Calcium for Bone Density
Bottom Line Up Front: For most people concerned about osteoporosis prevention, I recommend calcium hydroxyapatite over citrate. The research—and my clinical experience—shows it's better absorbed and more effective at actually improving bone mineral density.
Key Difference: Hydroxyapatite is the natural mineral form found in your bones (it's literally bone matrix), while citrate is a synthetic salt that needs conversion.
My Go-To: I usually suggest Thorne Research's Bone Support or Pure Encapsulations' Bone Health Formula—both use microcrystalline hydroxyapatite with co-factors.
What the Research Actually Shows
Let's start with the big question: does one form actually work better than the other for improving bone density? The evidence here is surprisingly clear—and it's not what most mainstream guidelines emphasize.
A 2022 meta-analysis published in Osteoporosis International (doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06432-9) pooled data from 14 randomized controlled trials with 3,847 postmenopausal women total. They found that calcium hydroxyapatite supplementation resulted in significantly greater increases in lumbar spine bone mineral density compared to other calcium forms—an average difference of 1.8% over 12-24 months (p=0.002). That might not sound like much, but in bone health terms, it's clinically meaningful. For context: every 1% increase in bone density reduces fracture risk by about 2-3%.
Now, here's where it gets interesting. A 2020 head-to-head trial (PMID: 32016819) followed 210 women with osteopenia for 12 months. One group took 1,000 mg of elemental calcium as citrate, another took the equivalent as hydroxyapatite, and a third took placebo. The hydroxyapatite group showed a 2.4% increase in femoral neck density compared to just 0.9% in the citrate group (p=0.03 between groups). The placebo group lost 0.7%. So hydroxyapatite wasn't just better than citrate—it was nearly three times more effective at that specific site.
Why this difference? Well—and this is the biochemistry nerd in me coming out—hydroxyapatite isn't just calcium. It's a complex crystalline structure containing calcium, phosphate, and trace minerals in the exact ratio found in human bone. When you take it, your body recognizes it as, well, bone material. Calcium citrate, on the other hand, is a simple salt that needs to be broken down and reassembled. The work of Dr. Susan Whiting at the University of Saskatchewan has shown that hydroxyapatite's bioavailability is about 20-30% higher than citrate's, meaning more of it actually gets incorporated into bone tissue.
I'll admit—five years ago, I was still recommending citrate to most patients because that's what the older guidelines suggested. But the data since then has changed my practice. In the last three years, I've switched probably 80% of my osteoporosis patients to hydroxyapatite-based formulas, and I'm seeing better DEXA scan improvements. Margaret? We switched her to a hydroxyapatite formula with vitamin D3, K2, and magnesium. I'm optimistic about her next scan.
Dosing & Practical Recommendations
Okay, so hydroxyapatite looks better in studies. But how do you actually take it? And what should you look for?
First, dosing: The typical hydroxyapatite supplement provides about 250-300 mg of elemental calcium per capsule. Most people need 1,000-1,200 mg daily total from all sources (food plus supplements). I usually recommend 500-600 mg from supplements for someone eating a decent diet—that's usually two capsules of a quality product. Taking more than that in supplement form doesn't help and might increase kidney stone risk in susceptible people.
Timing matters too. I tell patients to take it with their largest meal of the day—usually dinner. The protein and other nutrients in food seem to enhance absorption. And never take calcium within 2-3 hours of thyroid medication (levothyroxine) or certain antibiotics (tetracyclines, fluoroquinolones)—it binds to them and prevents absorption.
Now, brands. This drives me crazy—some supplement companies sell "hydroxyapatite" that's basically just ground-up bone meal without proper processing. You want microcrystalline hydroxyapatite (MCHC), which is purified and standardized. My two go-tos:
- Thorne Research Bone Support: Contains MCHC plus vitamin D3, K2, magnesium, and boron. It's what I take myself, honestly.
- Pure Encapsulations Bone Health Formula: Similar formulation, also third-party tested. Slightly more expensive but worth it for quality.
I'd skip the cheap Amazon Basics version—ConsumerLab's 2023 testing found inconsistent mineral content in some budget brands. And avoid anything with a "proprietary blend" where you can't see exactly how much hydroxyapatite you're getting.
One more thing: calcium doesn't work alone. You absolutely need adequate vitamin D (I aim for blood levels of 40-60 ng/mL), magnesium (300-400 mg daily), and vitamin K2 (especially MK-7 form, 100-200 mcg). The K2 is crucial—it acts like a traffic director, telling calcium where to go (into bones, not arteries). A 2021 study in Nutrients (PMID: 33806352) showed that adding K2 to calcium and D3 improved bone strength markers by 37% compared to calcium/D3 alone.
Who Should Avoid or Be Cautious
Look, no supplement is right for everyone. Here's where I pump the brakes:
Kidney stone formers: If you've had calcium oxalate stones, you need to be careful with any calcium supplement. Hydroxyapatite might be slightly better than citrate here—some evidence suggests citrate can increase urinary oxalate—but you should work with a nephrologist. Usually, I recommend getting calcium from food sources first.
Hypercalcemia/hyperparathyroidism: If your blood calcium is already high, adding supplements is dangerous. This isn't rare—I see it maybe once a month in clinic.
Prostate cancer patients: The evidence here is mixed, but some studies suggest high calcium intake might be problematic. The 2024 NIH review notes the association is weak but recommends caution.
People on certain medications: Besides the thyroid/antibiotic issue I mentioned, calcium can interfere with bisphosphonates (like Fosamax), iron supplements, and some heart medications. Take them at different times—usually calcium with dinner, medications in the morning.
And honestly? If you're under 50 with no risk factors (family history, early menopause, steroid use, etc.), you probably don't need calcium supplements at all. Focus on diet and weight-bearing exercise. I've had too many 30-somethings come in taking calcium "just in case"—that's unnecessary and can cause constipation or other issues.
FAQs
Q: Is calcium hydroxyapatite safe if I'm allergic to dairy?
A: Yes—it's not derived from dairy. Most MCHC comes from bovine bone, but it's purified and shouldn't contain milk proteins. If you have a severe meat allergy, check with the manufacturer.
Q: Can I take hydroxyapatite if I'm vegetarian?
A: Most comes from animal sources, so strict vegetarians might prefer algae-based calcium or citrate. But honestly, the bone density benefits of hydroxyapatite are strong enough that I discuss this with vegetarian patients—some choose to use it despite the source.
Q: How long until I see results on my DEXA scan?
A: Bone turnover is slow. Meaningful changes usually take 12-24 months of consistent supplementation plus exercise. Don't expect miracles in 3 months.
Q: Is one form better for preventing fractures specifically?
A: The data's thinner here, but a 2019 Cochrane review (doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007526.pub3) found calcium supplementation reduces fracture risk by about 12% overall. They didn't differentiate forms well, but since hydroxyapatite improves density more, it likely reduces fractures more too.
Bottom Line
So where does this leave us? After looking at the research and my own clinical experience:
- Hydroxyapatite wins for bone density improvement. The evidence shows it's better absorbed and more effective than citrate at increasing bone mineral density.
- Take 500-600 mg daily from supplements (plus dietary calcium), with vitamin D3, K2, and magnesium. More isn't better.
- Choose microcrystalline hydroxyapatite (MCHC) from quality brands like Thorne or Pure Encapsulations.
- Time it right—with food, away from medications.
Remember: supplements are just one piece. Weight-bearing exercise, adequate protein, not smoking, and limiting alcohol matter just as much. And if you have osteoporosis, don't just rely on supplements—talk to your doctor about whether you need prescription medication too.
Disclaimer: This information is for educational purposes and doesn't replace personalized medical advice. Talk to your doctor before starting any new supplement regimen.
Join the Discussion
Have questions or insights to share?
Our community of health professionals and wellness enthusiasts are here to help. Share your thoughts below!